Welcome to your source of quality news, articles, analysis and latest data.

Drivers wearing earbuds even if cellphone is dead still considered distracted driving: B.C. Supreme Court

The B.C. High Court has maintained a decision that says wearing earbuds in the two ears while driving — regardless of whether they’re associated with a dead iPhone — establishes diverted driving.

Equity Heather Holmes said a commonplace court judge didn’t make a blunder when deciding a year ago that earbuds connected to a cellphone by their wire become part of the electronic gadget.

The choice, delivered Tuesday, originated from an allure dispatched by Patrick Grzelak, a driver in Surrey, B.C., who was discovered wearing in-ear earphones in 2018 and was seen as liable of occupied driving.

Grzelak was driving home from a taxing day of work on Oct. 12, 2018, when cops seen him in the northward paths of 152 Street.

His iPhone was in the middle cubbyhole of the dashboard, with his wired headphones connected. The telephone’s battery was dead.

Grzelak said he had earbuds in his ears since he had been utilizing them during a taxing day of phone telephone calls. He said he built up a propensity for leaving them in his ears for the commute home to shut out interstate clamor.

Drivers can possibly wear one earbud when driving, as indicated by the B.C. Engine Vehicle Act.

The telephone wasn’t in the driver’s hands or lap. It wasn’t lit up or playing music, or being utilized to settle on decisions or explore.

Yet, in 2019, legal Justice Brent Adair discovered Grzelak was “lawfully” utilizing the telephone.

“Since the earbuds were important for the electronic gadget and since the earbuds were in the respondent’s ears, it fundamentally follows that the litigant was holding the gadget (or part of the gadget) in a situation wherein it could be utilized, for example his ears,” he wrote in his judgment.

Equity Holmes concurred with that evaluation, contending the “position in which the gadget was held was appropriate for the gadget’s utilization.”

Holmes highlighted a 2015 point of reference in commonplace court that said it didn’t make a difference that a telephone was dead since that didn’t change the meaning of an electronic gadget.

A diverted driving ticket costs $368 and four punishment focuses on a driver’s record.

Share Post
Written by
No comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.